Compare
Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR vs Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR
Short answer
The Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR (32–64mm) and Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR (32–90mm) are both standard lenses for the Fujifilm GFX mount. The Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR is the faster lens at T3.5 against f/4 on the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR. Only the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR has an aperture ring. Only the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR has optical stabilisation.
Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR: 5 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR | Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Focal length | 32–64mm | 32–90mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 25–51mm | 25–71mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4 | T3.5 |
| Mount | Fujifilm G | Fujifilm G |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Weather resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | Yes | No |
| Macro | No | No |
| Linear motor | Yes | No |
| Minimum aperture | f/32 | f/32 |
| Aperture blades | — | 13 |
| Lens construction | 14 elements in 11 groups | 25 elements in 19 groups |
| Special elements | 3 aspherical and 1 extra-low dispersion element and 1 super extra-low dispersion element | 3 aspherical and 3 ED elements |
| Angle of view | 81°-46.3° | 81.0°-33.8° |
| Minimum focus | 0.5 m | 0.8 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.12× | 0.06× |
| Weight | 875 g | 2150 g |
| Diameter | ⌀92.6 mm | — |
| Length | 116–145.5 mm | 222.5 mm |
| Filter thread | ⌀77 mm | ⌀111 mm |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR
- Aperture ring Yes vs No
- Minimum focus 0.5 m vs 0.8 m
- Maximum magnification 0.12× vs 0.06×
- Weight 875 g vs 2150 g
- Length 116–145.5 mm vs 222.5 mm
Reasons to choose the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR
- Longer reach 71 mm vs 51 mm
- Maximum aperture T3.5 vs f/4
- Optical stabilisation Yes vs No
Both have weather sealing.
Neither has a macro design.
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR | 25–51 mm | 68.8°–37.8° | 13.7–6.8 m |
| Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR | 25–71 mm | 68.8°–27.4° | 13.7–4.9 m |
The Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR gets 1.39× closer to the subject than the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR: whatever it points at fills 1.39× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.9× more of its area. With the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR you would have to walk about 28% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 52% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
Size and weight
- The Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR is 1275 g lighter than the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR, about 59% less.
- The Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR takes ⌀77 mm filters and the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR ⌀111 mm, so filters are not shared.
What each one suits
| Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR | Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Poor |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Poor | Fair |
| Travel | Good | Very good |
| Street | Average | Average |
| Weddings | Good | Very good |
| Walk around | Good | Good |
| Vlogging | Good | Very good |
| Landscape | Very good | Very good |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every GFX body with interchangeable lenses — 7 in our list.
Which one to choose
Choose the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR if
- weight matters to you. It is 1275 g lighter, roughly 59% less to carry.
Choose the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR if
- your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.39× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
- your camera body is not stabilised. Of these two, only this lens has optical stabilisation.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Which is lighter, the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR or the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR?
The Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR, by 1275 g — about 59% less.
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR or the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR?
The Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR. At T3.5 against f/4 it gathers 0.4 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Do the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR and Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR use the same filters?
No. The Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR takes ⌀77 mm and the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR ⌀111 mm. A step-up ring lets the smaller lens use the larger filters.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm G mount, so they fit any GFX camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit X Series bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which one is lighter?
The Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR, by 1275 g (875 g against 2150 g).
Which is better, the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR or the Fujinon GF32-90mmT3.5 PZ OIS WR?
On measurable specs the Fujinon GF32-64mmF4 R LM WR leads, 5 wins against 2. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.