Compare
Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR vs Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR
Short answer
The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR (100–400mm) and Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR (200mm) are both super-telephoto lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR is the faster lens at f/2 against f/4.5–5.6 on the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR: 4 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Focal length | 100–400mm | 200mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 150–600mm | 300mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4.5–5.6 | f/2 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | Yes | Yes |
| Macro | No | No |
| Linear motor | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Lens construction | 21 elements in 14 groups | 19 elements in 14 groups |
| Special elements | 5 extra low dispersion elements and 1 super extra low dispersion element | — |
| Angle of view | 16.2°- 4.1° | 8.1° |
| Minimum focus | 1.75 m | 1.8 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.19× | 0.12× |
| Weight | 1375 g | 2265 g |
| Diameter | ⌀94.8 mm | ⌀122 mm |
| Length | 210.5–270 mm | 205.5 mm |
| Filter thread | ⌀77 mm | ⌀105 mm |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
- Longer reach 600 mm vs 300 mm
- Wider view 150 mm vs 300 mm
- Minimum focus 1.75 m vs 1.8 m
- Maximum magnification 0.19× vs 0.12×
- Weight 1375 g vs 2265 g
- Diameter ⌀94.8 mm vs ⌀122 mm
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR
- Maximum aperture f/2 vs f/4.5–5.6
- Length 205.5 mm vs 210.5–270 mm
Both have weather sealing, an aperture ring, optical stabilisation, and a linear focus motor.
Neither has a macro design.
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | 150–600 mm | 13.4°–3.4° | 2.4–0.6 m |
| Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR | 300 mm | 6.7° | 1.2 m |
The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR gets 2× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR: whatever it points at fills 2× more of the frame edge to edge, or 4× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR you would have to walk about 50% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 25% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
Size and weight
- The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR is 890 g lighter than the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR, about 39% less.
- The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR is 5 mm longer.
- The Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR is 27.2 mm wider.
- The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR takes ⌀77 mm filters and the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR ⌀105 mm, so filters are not shared.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Excellent | Average |
| Sports | Poor | Excellent |
| Portrait | Poor | Poor |
| Travel | Good | Poor |
| Street | Poor | Poor |
| Weddings | Poor | Poor |
| Walk around | Good | Poor |
| Vlogging | Poor | Poor |
| Landscape | Poor | Poor |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Which one to choose
Choose the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR if
- your subject is far away. It magnifies 2× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
- weight matters to you. It is 890 g lighter, roughly 39% less to carry.
Choose the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR if
- low light is the priority. At f/2 it lets in 2.3 stops more than f/4.5–5.6 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Which is lighter, the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR or the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR?
The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR, by 890 g — about 39% less.
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR or the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR?
The Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR. At f/2 against f/4.5–5.6 it gathers 2.3 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Do the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR and Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR use the same filters?
No. The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR takes ⌀77 mm and the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR ⌀105 mm. A step-up ring lets the smaller lens use the larger filters.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which one is lighter?
The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR, by 890 g (1375 g against 2265 g).
Which is better, the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR or the Fujinon XF200mmF2 R LM OIS WR?
On measurable specs the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR leads, 4 wins against 2. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.