Compare
Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR vs Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Short answer
The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR (100–400mm) and Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD (150–500mm) are both super-telephoto lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR is the faster lens at f/4.5–5.6 against f/5–6.7 on the Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD. Only the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring.
Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR: 1 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Tamron |
| Focal length | 100–400mm | 150–500mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 150–600mm | 225–750mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4.5–5.6 | f/5–6.7 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather resistant | Yes | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | — |
| Macro | No | — |
| Linear motor | Yes | — |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | — |
| Aperture blades | 9 | — |
| Lens construction | 21 elements in 14 groups | — |
| Special elements | 5 extra low dispersion elements and 1 super extra low dispersion element | — |
| Angle of view | 16.2°- 4.1° | — |
| Minimum focus | 1.75 m | — |
| Maximum magnification | 0.19× | — |
| Weight | 1375 g | — |
| Diameter | ⌀94.8 mm | — |
| Length | 210.5–270 mm | — |
| Filter thread | ⌀77 mm | — |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
- Wider view 150 mm vs 225 mm
- Maximum aperture f/4.5–5.6 vs f/5–6.7
Reasons to choose the Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
- Longer reach 750 mm vs 600 mm
Both have optical stabilisation.
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | 150–600 mm | 13.4°–3.4° | 2.4–0.6 m |
| Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD | 225–750 mm | 9°–2.7° | 1.6–0.5 m |
The Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD gets 1.25× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR: whatever it points at fills 1.25× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.6× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR you would have to walk about 20% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 64% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR | Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Excellent | Excellent |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Poor | Poor |
| Travel | Good | Average |
| Street | Poor | Poor |
| Weddings | Poor | Poor |
| Walk around | Good | Good |
| Vlogging | Poor | Poor |
| Landscape | Poor | Poor |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Common questions
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR or the Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD?
The Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR. At f/4.5–5.6 against f/5–6.7 it gathers 0.3 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which is better, the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR or the Tamron 150-500mm F5-6.7 Di III VC VXD?
On measurable specs the Fujinon XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR leads, 1 wins against 0. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.