Compare
Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR vs Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF
Short answer
The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR (16–55mm) and Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF (28mm) are both standard lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR is the faster lens at f/2.8 against f/4.5 on the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF. Only the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring.
Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF: 4 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR | Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Viltrox |
| Focal length | 16–55mm | 28mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 24–83mm | 42mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/4.5 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Weather resistant | Yes | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | — |
| Macro | No | — |
| Linear motor | Yes | — |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | — |
| Aperture blades | 9 | — |
| Lens construction | 17 elements in 12 groups | 6 elements in 6 groups |
| Special elements | 3 aspherical and 3 extra low dispersion elements | — |
| Angle of view | 83.2°- 29° | — |
| Minimum focus | 0.6 m | 0.34 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.16× | — |
| Weight | 655 g | 60 g |
| Diameter | ⌀83.3 mm | ⌀60.3 mm |
| Length | 106–129.5 mm | 15.25 mm |
| Filter thread | ⌀77 mm | — |
| Launch price | — | $99 |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR
- Longer reach 83 mm vs 42 mm
- Wider view 24 mm vs 42 mm
- Maximum aperture f/2.8 vs f/4.5
Reasons to choose the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF
- Minimum focus 0.34 m vs 0.6 m
- Weight 60 g vs 655 g
- Diameter ⌀60.3 mm vs ⌀83.3 mm
- Length 15.25 mm vs 106–129.5 mm
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR | 24–83 mm | 72.6°–24.1° | 14.7–4.3 m |
| Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF | 42 mm | 45.5° | 8.4 m |
The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR gets 1.98× closer to the subject than the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF: whatever it points at fills 1.98× more of the frame edge to edge, or 3.9× more of its area. With the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF you would have to walk about 49% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 26% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
Size and weight
- The Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF is 595 g lighter than the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR, about 91% less.
- The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR is 90.8 mm longer.
- The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR is 23 mm wider.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR | Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Poor |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Average | Fair |
| Travel | Good | Excellent |
| Street | Very good | Very good |
| Weddings | Very good | Good |
| Walk around | Very good | Excellent |
| Vlogging | Good | Poor |
| Landscape | Excellent | Good |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Which one to choose
Choose the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR if
- low light is the priority. At f/2.8 it lets in 1.4 stops more than f/4.5 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
- your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.98× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
- you want more in the frame. It starts at 24 mm equivalent, against 42 mm on the other lens — interiors, landscapes and groups at close range.
Choose the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF if
- weight matters to you. It is 595 g lighter, roughly 91% less to carry.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Which is lighter, the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR or the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF?
The Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF, by 595 g — about 91% less.
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR or the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF?
The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR. At f/2.8 against f/4.5 it gathers 1.4 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which one is lighter?
The Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF, by 595 g (60 g against 655 g).
Which is better, the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR or the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF?
On measurable specs the Viltrox AF 28mm F4.5 XF leads, 4 wins against 1. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.