Compare
Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR vs Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR
Short answer
The Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR (16mm) and Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR (23mm) are both wide-angle lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR is the faster lens at f/1.4 against f/2.8 on the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR.
Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR: 4 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR | Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Focal length | 16mm | 23mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 24mm | 35mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.4 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Weather resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | Yes | Yes |
| Macro | No | No |
| Linear motor | No | Yes |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/16 |
| Aperture blades | 9 | 9 |
| Lens construction | 10 elements in 8 groups | 15 elements in 10 groups |
| Special elements | — | 2 aspherical and 3 ED elements |
| Angle of view | 83.2° | 63.4° |
| Minimum focus | 0.17 m | 0.19 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.13× | 0.2× |
| Weight | 155 g | 375 g |
| Diameter | ⌀60 mm | ⌀67 mm |
| Length | 45.4 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Filter thread | ⌀49 mm | ⌀58 mm |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR
- Wider view 24 mm vs 35 mm
- Minimum focus 0.17 m vs 0.19 m
- Weight 155 g vs 375 g
- Diameter ⌀60 mm vs ⌀67 mm
- Length 45.4 mm vs 77.8 mm
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR
- Longer reach 35 mm vs 24 mm
- Maximum aperture f/1.4 vs f/2.8
- Maximum magnification 0.2× vs 0.13×
Both have weather sealing and an aperture ring.
Neither has optical stabilisation and a macro design.
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR | 24 mm | 72.6° | 14.7 m |
| Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR | 35 mm | 54.1° | 10.2 m |
The Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR gets 1.46× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR: whatever it points at fills 1.46× more of the frame edge to edge, or 2.1× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR you would have to walk about 31% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 47% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
Size and weight
- The Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR is 220 g lighter than the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR, about 59% less.
- The Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR is 32.4 mm longer.
- The Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR is 7 mm wider.
- The Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR takes ⌀49 mm filters and the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR ⌀58 mm, so filters are not shared.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR | Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Poor |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Poor | Fair |
| Travel | Excellent | Very good |
| Street | Excellent | Excellent |
| Weddings | Very good | Excellent |
| Walk around | Very good | Excellent |
| Vlogging | Very good | Fair |
| Landscape | Excellent | Excellent |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Which one to choose
Choose the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR if
- you want more in the frame. It starts at 24 mm equivalent, against 35 mm on the other lens — interiors, landscapes and groups at close range.
- weight matters to you. It is 220 g lighter, roughly 59% less to carry.
Choose the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR if
- low light is the priority. At f/1.4 it lets in 2 stops more than f/2.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
- your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.46× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Which is lighter, the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR or the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR?
The Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR, by 220 g — about 59% less.
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR or the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR?
The Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR. At f/1.4 against f/2.8 it gathers 2 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Do the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR and Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR use the same filters?
No. The Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR takes ⌀49 mm and the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR ⌀58 mm. A step-up ring lets the smaller lens use the larger filters.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which one is lighter?
The Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR, by 220 g (155 g against 375 g).
Which is better, the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR or the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR?
On measurable specs the Fujinon XF16mmF2.8 R WR leads, 4 wins against 2. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.