Compare

Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR vs Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS

Short answer

The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR (18mm) and Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS (13–33mm) are both wide-angle lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR is the faster lens at f/1.4 against f/3.5–6.3 on the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS. Only the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring. Only the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS has optical stabilisation.

Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS: 5 specs ahead

Side by side

Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS
Brand Fujifilm Fujifilm
Focal length 18mm 13–33mm
35mm equivalent 27mm 20–50mm
Maximum aperture f/1.4 f/3.5–6.3
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Yes
Optical stabilisation No Yes
Weather resistant Yes No
Aperture ring Yes No
Macro No No
Linear motor Yes No
Minimum aperture f/16 f/22
Aperture blades 9 9
Lens construction 15 elements in 9 groups 10 elements in 9 groups
Special elements 3 aspherical and 1 ED elements 4 aspherical and 3 ED elements
Angle of view 76.5° 95.1°-46.6°
Minimum focus 0.2 m 0.2 m
Maximum magnification 0.15× 0.25×
Weight 370 g 125 g
Diameter ⌀68.8 mm ⌀61.9 mm
Length 75.6 mm 37.5–57.2 mm
Filter thread ⌀62 mm ⌀49 mm

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR

  • Maximum aperture f/1.4 vs f/3.5–6.3
  • Weather resistant Yes vs No
  • Aperture ring Yes vs No

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS

  • Longer reach 50 mm vs 27 mm
  • Wider view 20 mm vs 27 mm
  • Optical stabilisation Yes vs No
  • Maximum magnification 0.25× vs 0.15×
  • Weight 125 g vs 370 g
  • Diameter ⌀61.9 mm vs ⌀68.8 mm
  • Length 37.5–57.2 mm vs 75.6 mm

Neither has a macro design.

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR 27 mm 66.3° 13.1 m
Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS 20–50 mm 84.2°–39.2° 18.1–7.1 m

The Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS gets 1.85× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR: whatever it points at fills 1.85× more of the frame edge to edge, or 3.4× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR you would have to walk about 46% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 29% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

Size and weight

⌀68.8 × 75.6 mm⌀61.9 × 37.5–57.2 mm
Both lenses drawn at the same scale from Fujifilm’s published diameter and length. A dashed outline shows how much a zoom extends at its longest setting.
  • The Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS is 245 g lighter than the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR, about 66% less.
  • The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR is 38.1 mm longer.
  • The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR is 6.9 mm wider.
  • The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR takes ⌀62 mm filters and the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS ⌀49 mm, so filters are not shared.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WRFujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS
Birds and wildlife Poor Poor
Sports Poor Poor
Portrait Poor Poor
Travel Very good Excellent
Street Excellent Very good
Weddings Excellent Very good
Walk around Excellent Excellent
Vlogging Good Excellent
Landscape Excellent Good
Macro Poor Poor

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR if

  • low light is the priority. At f/1.4 it lets in 2.6 stops more than f/3.5–6.3 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
  • the weather is part of the job. Only this one is sealed against dust and moisture.

Choose the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS if

  • your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.85× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
  • you want more in the frame. It starts at 20 mm equivalent, against 27 mm on the other lens — interiors, landscapes and groups at close range.
  • your camera body is not stabilised. Of these two, only this lens has optical stabilisation.
  • weight matters to you. It is 245 g lighter, roughly 66% less to carry.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Which is lighter, the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR or the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS?

The Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS, by 245 g — about 66% less.

Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR or the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS?

The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR. At f/1.4 against f/3.5–6.3 it gathers 2.6 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.

Do the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR and Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS use the same filters?

No. The Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR takes ⌀62 mm and the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS ⌀49 mm. A step-up ring lets the smaller lens use the larger filters.

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which one is lighter?

The Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS, by 245 g (125 g against 370 g).

Which is better, the Fujinon XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR or the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS?

On measurable specs the Fujinon XC13-33mmF3.5-6.3 OIS leads, 5 wins against 3. That is a spec count, not a field test.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.