Compare

Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR vs Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

Short answer

The Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR (27mm) and Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD (17–70mm) are both standard lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. Only the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring. Only the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD has optical stabilisation.

Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD: 1 specs ahead

Side by side

Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Brand Fujifilm Tamron
Focal length 27mm 17–70mm
35mm equivalent 41mm 26–105mm
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Yes
Optical stabilisation No Yes
Weather resistant Yes —
Aperture ring Yes —
Macro No —
Linear motor No —
Minimum aperture f/16 —
Aperture blades 7 —
Lens construction 7 elements in 5 groups —
Special elements 1 aspherical element —
Angle of view 55.5° —
Minimum focus 0.34 m —
Maximum magnification 0.1× —
Weight 84 g —
Diameter ⌀62 mm —
Length 23 mm —
Filter thread ⌀39 mm —

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR

Nothing measurable in its favour.

Reasons to choose the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

  • Longer reach 105 mm vs 41 mm
  • Wider view 26 mm vs 41 mm
  • Optical stabilisation Yes vs No

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR 41 mm 47° 8.7 m
Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD 26–105 mm 69.3°–19.1° 13.8–3.4 m

The Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD gets 2.56× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR: whatever it points at fills 2.56× more of the frame edge to edge, or 6.6× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR you would have to walk about 61% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 15% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WRTamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Birds and wildlife Poor Poor
Sports Poor Fair
Portrait Average Good
Travel Excellent Excellent
Street Excellent Very good
Weddings Very good Very good
Walk around Excellent Very good
Vlogging Poor Excellent
Landscape Excellent Good
Macro Poor Poor

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD if

  • your subject is far away. It magnifies 2.56× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
  • you want more in the frame. It starts at 26 mm equivalent, against 41 mm on the other lens — interiors, landscapes and groups at close range.
  • your camera body is not stabilised. Of these two, only this lens has optical stabilisation.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which is better, the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR or the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD?

On measurable specs the Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD leads, 1 wins against 0. That is a spec count, not a field test.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.