Compare
Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR vs Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF
Short answer
The Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR (27mm) and Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF (33mm) are both standard lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF is the faster lens at f/1.4 against f/2.8 on the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR. Only the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring.
Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF: 1 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR | Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Viltrox |
| Focal length | 27mm | 33mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 41mm | 50mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.4 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Weather resistant | Yes | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | — |
| Macro | No | — |
| Linear motor | No | — |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | — |
| Aperture blades | 7 | — |
| Lens construction | 7 elements in 5 groups | — |
| Special elements | 1 aspherical element | — |
| Angle of view | 55.5° | — |
| Minimum focus | 0.34 m | — |
| Maximum magnification | 0.1× | — |
| Weight | 84 g | — |
| Diameter | ⌀62 mm | — |
| Length | 23 mm | — |
| Filter thread | ⌀39 mm | — |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR
- Wider view 41 mm vs 50 mm
Reasons to choose the Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF
- Longer reach 50 mm vs 41 mm
- Maximum aperture f/1.4 vs f/2.8
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR | 41 mm | 47° | 8.7 m |
| Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF | 50 mm | 39.2° | 7.1 m |
The Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF gets 1.22× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR: whatever it points at fills 1.22× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.5× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR you would have to walk about 18% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 67% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR | Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Poor |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Average | Very good |
| Travel | Excellent | Very good |
| Street | Excellent | Very good |
| Weddings | Very good | Excellent |
| Walk around | Excellent | Excellent |
| Vlogging | Poor | Poor |
| Landscape | Excellent | Fair |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Which one to choose
Choose the Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF if
- low light is the priority. At f/1.4 it lets in 2 stops more than f/2.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR or the Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF?
The Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF. At f/1.4 against f/2.8 it gathers 2 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which is better, the Fujinon XF27mmF2.8 R WR or the Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF?
On measurable specs the Viltrox AF 33mm F1.4 XF leads, 1 wins against 0. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.