Compare

Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro vs Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2

Short answer

The Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro (30mm) and Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2 (27mm) are both standard lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2 is the faster lens at f/1.2 against f/2.8 on the Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro. Only the Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro has weather sealing, an aperture ring, and autofocus.

Evenly matched on paper

Side by side

Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2
Brand Fujifilm Voigtlander
Focal length 30mm 27mm
35mm equivalent 45mm 41mm
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/1.2
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Manual focus
Optical stabilisation No —
Weather resistant Yes —
Aperture ring Yes —
Macro Yes —
Linear motor Yes —
Minimum aperture f/22 —
Aperture blades 9 —
Lens construction 11 elements in 9 groups —
Special elements 3 aspherical and 2 ED elements —
Angle of view 50.7° —
Minimum focus 0.1 m —
Maximum magnification 1× —
Weight 195 g —
Diameter ⌀60 mm —
Length 69.5 mm —
Filter thread ⌀43 mm —

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro

  • Longer reach 45 mm vs 41 mm
  • Autofocus Yes vs Manual focus

Reasons to choose the Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2

  • Wider view 41 mm vs 45 mm
  • Maximum aperture f/1.2 vs f/2.8

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro 45 mm 42.8° 7.8 m
Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2 41 mm 47° 8.7 m

The Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro gets 1.1× closer to the subject than the Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2: whatever it points at fills 1.1× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.2× more of its area. With the Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2 you would have to walk about 9% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 83% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR MacroVoigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2
Birds and wildlife Poor Poor
Sports Poor Poor
Portrait Average Average
Travel Excellent Good
Street Excellent Excellent
Weddings Very good Very good
Walk around Excellent Very good
Vlogging Poor Poor
Landscape Very good Good
Macro Excellent Poor

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2 if

  • low light is the priority. At f/1.2 it lets in 2.4 stops more than f/2.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro or the Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2?

The Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2. At f/1.2 against f/2.8 it gathers 2.4 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which is better, the Fujinon XF30mmF2.8 R LM WR Macro or the Voigtlander Nokton 27mm F1.2?

On paper they come out even across 22 compared specs. What is left is handling and today’s price, which this page does not measure.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.