Compare
Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR vs Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS
Short answer
The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR (50–140mm) and Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS (55–200mm) are both telephoto lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR is the faster lens at f/2.8 against f/3.5–4.8 on the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS. Only the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR has weather sealing.
Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS: 4 specs ahead
Side by side
| Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR | Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Focal length | 50–140mm | 55–200mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 75–210mm | 83–300mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5–4.8 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Weather resistant | Yes | No |
| Aperture ring | Yes | Yes |
| Macro | No | No |
| Linear motor | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Aperture blades | 7 | 7 |
| Lens construction | 23 elements in 16 groups | 14 elements in 10 groups |
| Special elements | 5 extra low dispersion elements and 1 super extra low dispersion element | 1 aspherical, 1 ED and 1 super ED elements |
| Angle of view | 31.7° – 11.6° | 29.0° – 8.1° |
| Minimum focus | 1 m | 1.1 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.12× | 0.18× |
| Weight | 995 g | 580 g |
| Diameter | ⌀82.9 mm | ⌀75 mm |
| Length | 175.9 mm | 118–177 mm |
| Filter thread | ⌀72 mm | ⌀62 mm |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR
- Wider view 75 mm vs 83 mm
- Maximum aperture f/2.8 vs f/3.5–4.8
- Weather resistant Yes vs No
- Minimum focus 1 m vs 1.1 m
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS
- Longer reach 300 mm vs 210 mm
- Maximum magnification 0.18× vs 0.12×
- Weight 580 g vs 995 g
- Diameter ⌀75 mm vs ⌀82.9 mm
- Length 118–177 mm vs 175.9 mm
Both have an aperture ring, optical stabilisation, and a linear focus motor.
Neither has a macro design.
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR | 75–210 mm | 26.4°–9.6° | 4.7–1.7 m |
| Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS | 83–300 mm | 24.1°–6.7° | 4.3–1.2 m |
The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS gets 1.43× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR: whatever it points at fills 1.43× more of the frame edge to edge, or 2× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR you would have to walk about 30% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 49% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
Size and weight
- The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS is 415 g lighter than the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR, about 42% less.
- The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR is 57.9 mm longer.
- The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR is 7.9 mm wider.
- The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR takes ⌀72 mm filters and the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS ⌀62 mm, so filters are not shared.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR | Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Average |
| Sports | Excellent | Very good |
| Portrait | Very good | Good |
| Travel | Fair | Good |
| Street | Poor | Poor |
| Weddings | Excellent | Average |
| Walk around | Fair | Good |
| Vlogging | Poor | Poor |
| Landscape | Poor | Poor |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Which one to choose
Choose the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR if
- low light is the priority. At f/2.8 it lets in 0.6 stops more than f/3.5–4.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
- the weather is part of the job. Only this one is sealed against dust and moisture.
Choose the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS if
- your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.43× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
- weight matters to you. It is 415 g lighter, roughly 42% less to carry.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Which is lighter, the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR or the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS?
The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS, by 415 g — about 42% less.
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR or the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS?
The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR. At f/2.8 against f/3.5–4.8 it gathers 0.6 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Do the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR and Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS use the same filters?
No. The Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR takes ⌀72 mm and the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS ⌀62 mm. A step-up ring lets the smaller lens use the larger filters.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which one is lighter?
The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS, by 415 g (580 g against 995 g).
Which is better, the Fujinon XF50-140mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR or the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS?
On measurable specs the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS leads, 4 wins against 3. That is a spec count, not a field test.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.