Compare
Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR vs Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
Short answer
The Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR (50mm) and Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF (56mm) are both portrait lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR is the faster lens at f/1 against f/1.2 on the Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF. Only the Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR has an aperture ring.
Evenly matched on paper
Side by side
| Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR | Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Viltrox |
| Focal length | 50mm | 56mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 75mm | 84mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/1 | f/1.2 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Weather resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Aperture ring | Yes | — |
| Macro | No | — |
| Linear motor | No | — |
| Minimum aperture | f/16 | — |
| Aperture blades | 9 | — |
| Lens construction | 12 elements in 9 groups | 13 elements in 8 groups |
| Special elements | 1 aspherical, 2 ED elements | — |
| Angle of view | 31.7° | — |
| Minimum focus | 0.7 m | 0.5 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.08× | — |
| Weight | 845 g | — |
| Diameter | ⌀87 mm | — |
| Length | 103.5 mm | — |
| Filter thread | ⌀77 mm | ⌀67 mm |
| Launch price | — | $522 |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR
- Wider view 75 mm vs 84 mm
- Maximum aperture f/1 vs f/1.2
Reasons to choose the Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
- Longer reach 84 mm vs 75 mm
- Minimum focus 0.5 m vs 0.7 m
Both have weather sealing.
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR | 75 mm | 26.4° | 4.7 m |
| Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF | 84 mm | 23.7° | 4.2 m |
The Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF gets 1.12× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR: whatever it points at fills 1.12× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.3× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR you would have to walk about 11% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 80% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR | Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Poor |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Excellent | Excellent |
| Travel | Average | Fair |
| Street | Poor | Poor |
| Weddings | Excellent | Excellent |
| Walk around | Very good | Good |
| Vlogging | Poor | Poor |
| Landscape | Poor | Poor |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Common questions
Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR or the Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF?
The Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR. At f/1 against f/1.2 it gathers 0.5 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which is better, the Fujinon XF50mmF1.0 R WR or the Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF?
On paper they come out even across 23 compared specs. What is left is handling and today’s price, which this page does not measure.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.