Compare

Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS vs Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR

Short answer

The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS (55–200mm) and Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR (70–300mm) are both telephoto lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS is the faster lens at f/3.5–4.8 against f/4–5.6 on the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR. Only the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has weather sealing.

Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR: 3 specs ahead

Side by side

Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Brand Fujifilm Fujifilm
Focal length 55–200mm 70–300mm
35mm equivalent 83–300mm 105–450mm
Maximum aperture f/3.5–4.8 f/4–5.6
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Yes
Optical stabilisation Yes Yes
Weather resistant No Yes
Aperture ring Yes Yes
Macro No No
Linear motor Yes Yes
Minimum aperture f/22 f/22
Aperture blades 7 9
Lens construction 14 elements in 10 groups 17 elements in 12 groups
Special elements 1 aspherical, 1 ED and 1 super ED elements 1 aspherical and 2 ED elements
Angle of view 29.0° – 8.1° 22.9°-5.4°
Minimum focus 1.1 m 0.83 m
Maximum magnification 0.18× 0.33×
Weight 580 g 580 g
Diameter ⌀75 mm ⌀75 mm
Length 118–177 mm 132.5–205.5 mm
Filter thread ⌀62 mm ⌀67 mm

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

  • Wider view 83 mm vs 105 mm
  • Maximum aperture f/3.5–4.8 vs f/4–5.6
  • Length 118–177 mm vs 132.5–205.5 mm

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR

  • Longer reach 450 mm vs 300 mm
  • Weather resistant Yes vs No
  • Minimum focus 0.83 m vs 1.1 m
  • Maximum magnification 0.33× vs 0.18×

Both have an aperture ring, optical stabilisation, and a linear focus motor.

Neither has a macro design.

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS 83–300 mm 24.1°–6.7° 4.3–1.2 m
Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR 105–450 mm 19.1°–4.5° 3.4–0.8 m

The Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR gets 1.5× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS: whatever it points at fills 1.5× more of the frame edge to edge, or 2.3× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS you would have to walk about 33% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 44% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

Size and weight

⌀75 × 118–177 mm⌀75 × 132.5–205.5 mm
Both lenses drawn at the same scale from Fujifilm’s published diameter and length. A dashed outline shows how much a zoom extends at its longest setting.
  • Both lenses weigh the same.
  • The Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR is 14.5 mm longer.
  • The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS takes ⌀62 mm filters and the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR ⌀67 mm, so filters are not shared.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OISFujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Birds and wildlife Average Very good
Sports Very good Very good
Portrait Good Poor
Travel Good Very good
Street Poor Poor
Weddings Average Poor
Walk around Good Very good
Vlogging Poor Poor
Landscape Poor Poor
Macro Poor Poor

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR if

  • your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.5× more, and walking closer is not always an option.
  • the weather is part of the job. Only this one is sealed against dust and moisture.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS or the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR?

The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS. At f/3.5–4.8 against f/4–5.6 it gathers 0.4 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.

Do the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS and Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR use the same filters?

No. The Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS takes ⌀62 mm and the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR ⌀67 mm. A step-up ring lets the smaller lens use the larger filters.

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which is better, the Fujinon XF55-200mmF3.5-4.8 R LM OIS or the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR?

On measurable specs the Fujinon XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR leads, 3 wins against 2. That is a spec count, not a field test.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.