Compare

Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR vs Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro

Short answer

The Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR (56mm) and Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro (50mm) are both portrait lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR is the faster lens at f/1.2 against f/2.8 on the Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro. Only the Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring.

Evenly matched on paper

Side by side

Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro
Brand Fujifilm Zeiss
Focal length 56mm 50mm
35mm equivalent 84mm 75mm
Maximum aperture f/1.2 f/2.8
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Yes
Optical stabilisation No —
Weather resistant Yes —
Aperture ring Yes —
Macro No Yes
Linear motor No —
Minimum aperture f/16 —
Aperture blades 11 —
Lens construction 13 elements in 8 groups —
Special elements 2 aspherical and 1 ED elements —
Angle of view 28.5° —
Minimum focus 0.5 m —
Maximum magnification 0.14× —
Weight 445 g —
Diameter ⌀79.4 mm —
Length 76 mm —
Filter thread ⌀67 mm —

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR

  • Longer reach 84 mm vs 75 mm
  • Maximum aperture f/1.2 vs f/2.8

Reasons to choose the Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro

  • Wider view 75 mm vs 84 mm
  • Macro Yes vs No

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR 84 mm 23.7° 4.2 m
Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro 75 mm 26.4° 4.7 m

The Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR gets 1.12× closer to the subject than the Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro: whatever it points at fills 1.12× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.3× more of its area. With the Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro you would have to walk about 11% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 80% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WRZeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro
Birds and wildlife Poor Poor
Sports Poor Poor
Portrait Excellent Very good
Travel Fair Good
Street Poor Poor
Weddings Excellent Very good
Walk around Good Very good
Vlogging Poor Poor
Landscape Poor Poor
Macro Poor Very good

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR if

  • low light is the priority. At f/1.2 it lets in 2.4 stops more than f/2.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR or the Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro?

The Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR. At f/1.2 against f/2.8 it gathers 2.4 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which is better, the Fujinon XF56mmF1.2 R WR or the Zeiss Touit 50mm F2.8 Macro?

On paper they come out even across 22 compared specs. What is left is handling and today’s price, which this page does not measure.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.