Compare
Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR vs Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD
Short answer
The Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR (8–16mm) and Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD (11–20mm) are both ultra-wide lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. Only the Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR has weather sealing and an aperture ring.
Evenly matched on paper
Side by side
| Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR | Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Tamron |
| Focal length | 8–16mm | 11–20mm |
| 35mm equivalent | 12–24mm | 17–30mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Weather resistant | Yes | — |
| Aperture ring | Yes | — |
| Macro | No | — |
| Linear motor | Yes | — |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | — |
| Lens construction | 20 elements in 13 groups | — |
| Special elements | 4 aspherical, 3 ED, 3 super ED elements | — |
| Angle of view | 121° – 83.2° | — |
| Minimum focus | 0.25 m | — |
| Maximum magnification | 0.1× | — |
| Weight | 805 g | — |
| Diameter | ⌀88 mm | — |
| Length | 121.5 mm | — |
Where each one is ahead
Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR
- Wider view 12 mm vs 17 mm
Reasons to choose the Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD
- Longer reach 30 mm vs 24 mm
Framing and reach
| Lens | Frames like | Horizontal view | Frame width at 10 m |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR | 12–24 mm | 111.5°–72.6° | 29.4–14.7 m |
| Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD | 17–30 mm | 93.8°–60.9° | 21.4–11.8 m |
The Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD gets 1.25× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR: whatever it points at fills 1.25× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.6× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR you would have to walk about 20% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 64% of the original pixels.
Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.
What each one suits
| Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR | Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Birds and wildlife | Poor | Poor |
| Sports | Poor | Poor |
| Portrait | Poor | Poor |
| Travel | Average | Good |
| Street | Fair | Good |
| Weddings | Good | Good |
| Walk around | Average | Good |
| Vlogging | Good | Very good |
| Landscape | Excellent | Good |
| Macro | Poor | Poor |
Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.
Cameras that take both
Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.
Which one to choose
Choose the Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR if
- you want more in the frame. It starts at 12 mm equivalent, against 17 mm on the other lens — interiors, landscapes and groups at close range.
Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.
Common questions
Will both lenses fit my camera?
Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.
compare.faqTitle
Which is better, the Fujinon XF8-16mmF2.8 R LM WR or the Tamron 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD?
On paper they come out even across 20 compared specs. What is left is handling and today’s price, which this page does not measure.
Owner reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.
Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.