Compare

Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro vs Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF

Short answer

The Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro (80mm) and Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF (85mm) are both portrait lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF is the faster lens at f/1.8 against f/2.8 on the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro. Only the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro has weather sealing, optical stabilisation, and an aperture ring.

Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF: 1 specs ahead

Side by side

Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF
Brand Fujifilm Viltrox
Focal length 80mm 85mm
35mm equivalent 120mm 128mm
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/1.8
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Yes
Optical stabilisation Yes —
Weather resistant Yes —
Aperture ring Yes —
Macro Yes —
Linear motor Yes —
Minimum aperture f/22 —
Aperture blades 9 —
Lens construction 16 elements in 12 groups 10 elements in 7 groups
Angle of view 20.1° —
Minimum focus 0.25 m —
Maximum magnification 1× —
Weight 750 g —
Diameter ⌀80 mm —
Length 130 mm —
Filter thread ⌀62 mm —
Launch price — $329

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

  • Wider view 120 mm vs 128 mm

Reasons to choose the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF

  • Longer reach 128 mm vs 120 mm
  • Maximum aperture f/1.8 vs f/2.8

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro 120 mm 16.7° 2.9 m
Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF 128 mm 15.7° 2.8 m

The Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF gets 1.07× closer to the subject than the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro: whatever it points at fills 1.07× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.1× more of its area. With the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro you would have to walk about 6% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 88% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR MacroViltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF
Birds and wildlife Poor Poor
Sports Fair Average
Portrait Very good Excellent
Travel Poor Poor
Street Poor Poor
Weddings Excellent Very good
Walk around Poor Poor
Vlogging Poor Poor
Landscape Poor Poor
Macro Excellent Poor

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF if

  • low light is the priority. At f/1.8 it lets in 1.3 stops more than f/2.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro or the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF?

The Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF. At f/1.8 against f/2.8 it gathers 1.3 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which is better, the Fujinon XF80mmF2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro or the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF?

On measurable specs the Viltrox AF 85mm F1.8 II XF leads, 1 wins against 0. That is a spec count, not a field test.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.