Compare

Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR vs Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro

Short answer

The Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR (90mm) and Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro (65mm) are both portrait lenses for the Fujifilm X mount. The Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR is the faster lens at f/2 against f/2.8 on the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro. Only the Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR has weather sealing, an aperture ring, and autofocus.

Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR: 2 specs ahead

Side by side

Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro
Brand Fujifilm Laowa
Focal length 90mm 65mm
35mm equivalent 135mm 98mm
Maximum aperture f/2 f/2.8
Mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Autofocus Yes Manual focus
Optical stabilisation No —
Weather resistant Yes —
Aperture ring Yes —
Macro No Yes
Linear motor Yes —
Minimum aperture f/16 —
Aperture blades 7 —
Lens construction 11 elements in 8 groups —
Special elements 3 extra low dispersion elements —
Angle of view 17.9° —
Minimum focus 0.6 m —
Maximum magnification 0.2× —
Weight 540 g —
Diameter ⌀75 mm —
Length 105 mm —
Filter thread ⌀62 mm —

Where each one is ahead

Reasons to choose the Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR

  • Longer reach 135 mm vs 98 mm
  • Maximum aperture f/2 vs f/2.8
  • Autofocus Yes vs Manual focus

Reasons to choose the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro

  • Wider view 98 mm vs 135 mm
  • Macro Yes vs No

Framing and reach

Lens Frames like Horizontal view Frame width at 10 m
Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR 135 mm 14.9° 2.6 m
Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro 98 mm 20.5° 3.6 m

The Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR gets 1.38× closer to the subject than the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro: whatever it points at fills 1.38× more of the frame edge to edge, or 1.9× more of its area. With the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro you would have to walk about 27% of the distance towards the subject to get the same picture — or crop it later, which leaves roughly 53% of the original pixels.

Angles and widths are calculated from focal length and sensor width, horizontally, on the native sensor of each mount.

What each one suits

Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WRLaowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro
Birds and wildlife Poor Poor
Sports Average Poor
Portrait Excellent Good
Travel Poor Poor
Street Poor Poor
Weddings Excellent Good
Walk around Poor Poor
Vlogging Poor Poor
Landscape Poor Poor
Macro Poor Average

Scored from the published specifications — focal length, aperture, stabilisation, weather sealing and weight. Sharpness, bokeh and rendering are not in a spec sheet and are not scored here.

Cameras that take both

Both lenses fit every interchangeable-lens X Series body — 34 in our list. Fixed-lens models such as the X100 series cannot take them.

Which one to choose

Choose the Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR if

  • low light is the priority. At f/2 it lets in 1 stops more than f/2.8 — faster shutter speeds indoors and softer backgrounds.
  • your subject is far away. It magnifies 1.38× more, and walking closer is not always an option.

Everything above comes from published specifications. How sharp each lens is, how quickly it focuses and what its pictures look like are not in any spec sheet, so this comparison does not try to judge them.

Common questions

Which is better in low light, the Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR or the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro?

The Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR. At f/2 against f/2.8 it gathers 1 stops more light, which matters without flash and for background blur. Stabilisation can offset some of that for still subjects, but not for moving ones.

Will both lenses fit my camera?

Both use the Fujifilm X mount, so they fit any X Series camera with interchangeable lenses. They do not fit fixed-lens models such as the X100 series or GFX bodies.

compare.faqTitle

Which is better, the Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR or the Laowa 65mm F2.8 2x Ultra Macro?

On measurable specs the Fujinon XF90mmF2 R LM WR leads, 2 wins against 1. That is a spec count, not a field test.

Owner reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to write one.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are read before they go live. No email needed.

Built from the specifications Fujifilm publishes.